Is the Unjust Steward truly commended by Jesus for his shrewd decision to reduce debts and ingratiate friends? Or is he a dishonest manager that no one would trust? Does Jesus use sarcasm in Luke 16? Is the lesson only about financial dealings in worldly matters, or is there another level to the story? We decided to investigate.

Context

As always, examining the context helps to see who Jesus was addressing, and for what reason. The parable in Luke 16 follows the parable of the Lost Sheep, the Lost Coin, and the Prodigal Son. We know from Luke 14 that Jesus was at a chief Pharisees’ house. In chapter 15 the publicans and sinners wanted to hear Jesus speak and had come close, while the Pharisees and Scribes were still nearby. At the end of the Parable of the Unjust Steward, the Pharisees were still listening and resented the message. So, it seems that all these parables may have been told in succession, perhaps while Jesus was at the chief Pharisees’ house.

It is also possible that the parable of the Unjust Steward is a continuation of the Parable of the Lost, with a change of focus now towards the ‘Elder’ Son who proudly stayed with his Father. Although serving for many years and thinking he had never ‘transgressed’ any of the commandments, the Elder certainly never developed the character of his father. He was angry and resentful towards his wayward brother’s return, while his loving father was merciful and forgiving. 

Word Meanings

Sometimes it helps to look at the word-meanings. A ‘steward’ is a ‘house-distributor, or a manager, or an overseer.’ Joseph and Daniel both served faithfully in this capacity and are excellent examples of faithful stewards. However, this steward had wasted his [Lord’s] goods’. To ‘waste’ has the idea of ‘dissipate, squander, scatter’. It is the identical word used of the Prodigal Son who wasted his substance with riotous living’. However, this steward was still in the house; he hadn’t left! Like the Lost Coin parable, the Elder Son was lost inside the house.

‘I cannot dig’

When the steward’s ‘wastefulness’ was discovered, he was told he would be dismissed from his job. Like anyone getting a ‘pink slip’, this provoked anxious thoughts about how he would provide for himself. The first two options that came to his mind were to ‘dig’ or ‘beg’. Dig means ‘dig’ – but the word is only used in two other places in the New Testament!  One is in Luke 6:48, where Jesus talks about digging deep to lay your house (life) on the foundation of Christ. The other is in Luke 13:8, where the gardener decides to dig about an unproductive tree one more time to fertilize it and give it another chance to be fruitful. This is interesting… maybe the wasteful steward was not willing to dig deep and build his life on Christ’s commands? Or dig around others (perhaps the debtors!) to help encourage them to a life of productivity in Christ? As a steward he should have been doing these things – providing meat in due season for all in the house (Matthew 24:45-46). It seems he had never been willing to ‘dig’, and wasn’t willing to change his wasteful ways.

‘To beg I am ashamed’

Well, then what about the word ‘beg’? The word meaning isn’t all that revealing; it simply means to ask again and again, or to beg. Yet, there are plenty of places we are told to ‘ask’.

Ask and it shall be given you” (Matthew 7:7)

God knows how to ‘give good things to them that ask’” (Matthew 7:11).

Was there something the wasteful steward should have asked from his master? For instance, had he ever considered asking for forgiveness? Yes, he had been caught in sin, and he felt guilty and ashamed, but surely the best option at this point would have been to beg for mercy and forgiveness!

Generous with another man’s goods

In contrast, when the Prodigal Son came to his senses and realized he had made a foolish mistake, he decided to return to his Father, confess his failure, and beg for forgiveness. He was so humbled by his experience, he only asked to be a servant for the rest of his life.  The Unjust Steward didn’t consider asking for mercy, he decided instead to rely on his own ingenuity. “Take your bill,” he said to his master’s debtors, and then he ‘generously’ discounted the debts at his master’s expense! This isn’t true generousity – true generosity comes out of our own pocket. Discounting debts on a personal whim, is also not faithful management of his master’s property; he was continuing to be a waster. However, for those of his Lord’s debtors who weren’t loyal customers, this discounting of their debt would have endeared this ‘unjust’ steward to them.

Have we ever had the experience where a cashier, or waitress gives us a special deal hinting that it’s on their own initiative? Do we insist on an honest payment out of loyalty to the owner, or are we quick to take the advantage and go away with a glowing report of the good deal we were given? Would we return to seek out that same waitress or cashier the next time we visited? Would they become our favourite? Our friend?

If the debt in the parable refers to sin, as in, ‘forgive us our debts’ – faithful stewards don’t have the authority to ‘mark-down’ the debt a fellow-believer has to God. Just telling someone, “Don’t worry, God loves you as you are. You don’t have to change, He’ll overlook your sin”, does not take away their debt! In fact, it can give them a false sense of security. Far better to direct them towards God, the one who can truly forgive them!

The Bill

Looking up the word ‘bill’, we were surprised to discover it was the word ‘gramma’ – the word used for ‘scripture’ in many places! Was this steward discounting the Scriptures to bring himself into favour with others? Is it even possible to do this? Some scriptural ‘echoes’ helped to make this analogy clear.

For we are not as many, which corrupt [‘peddle, adulterate, to do a thing for base gain’] the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ.” (2 Corinthians 2:17).

Or we read in 2 Corinthians 4:2, “But have renounced the hidden things of dishonesty, not walking in craftiness, nor handling the word of God deceitfully; but by manifestation of the truth commending ourselves to every man’s conscience in the sight of God.”

Discounting the Scriptures?

Now, if this parable was directed to the Pharisees, was there a way in which they were handling God’s Word deceitfully? Were they discounting the Scriptures in order to bring themselves into favour with others, with ‘fake generosity’ that wasn’t coming from God? We were reminded of the Corban law in Mark 7:6-13, where the Pharisees had found a way to get around God’s command to look after one’s father and mother. Jesus told them they were, “Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition.”

The prophet Ezekiel told the people of his day, “with lies ye have made the heart of the righteous sad, whom I have not made sad; and strengthened the hands of the wicked, that he should not return from his wicked way, by promising him life.”

The Luke 16 parable is powerful, because we can all think of examples where we or others have discounted people’s debts to God, without truly having the authority to do so. If God has clearly spoken in His Word about right and wrong, whether in regards to belief or practice, we need to be careful to proclaim the same accurate message that He has given. It is God who has set the terms for salvation, not us. Ironically, God’s promise of forgiveness is full and complete to all who confess and forsake their sins and ASK for forgiveness. To change the Gospel message to make it more appealing in order to make ourselves seem more compassionate, or merciful, or generous, will actually defeat the gift that God has given. Sin that is not confessed cannot be forgiven. The Unjust Steward offered 50% forgiveness at the most, while God offers 100%!

Commended?

However, one of the most confusing parts of this parable is that the Unjust Steward is commended for his actions. Is this a true commendation from Jesus, or is it a sarcastic remark? Would Jesus truly encourage us to ‘make friends of the mammon of unrighteousness [“injustice, moral wrongfulness of character, life or act’]’? This doesn’t add up with the lessons he draws from this parable in verses 10-13. He says, “ye cannot serve God and mammon.”

‘Everlasting Habitations’

We looked carefully at what the Unjust Steward hoped to gain. What are the ‘everlasting habitations’ of those who act like this unjust steward? Everlasting means ‘perpetual, eternal, for ever’, which is no surprise. However, ‘habitations’ means ‘tent, tabernacle, a cloth hut’. This is an oxymoron! Tents are certainly not permanent dealing places, any more than being taken into the home of a worldly friend will last longer than this life. The only permanent dwelling place for those who choose not to obey God or seek His forgiveness – is in the grave! This is the ‘eternal home’ offered to an unrepentant unjust steward.

‘Wiser than the Children of Light’

But what about the statement Jesus made in verse 8, that, “the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light”? Paul also drew lessons from godless people, for example, the athlete (1 Cor. 9:24-27), and the soldier (2 Timothy 2:3-6), but he wasn’t trying to encourage us to choose their occupations. Rather, the lesson is to follow their complete dedication and commitment in service to our Master, the Lord Jesus Christ.

The Unjust Steward may have enjoyed winning the favour of his Lord’s debtors, and he may have been rewarded for his unjust actions by the grateful customers who loved him for his fake generosity. However, the best they could give him was praise and comfort for this life. “Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.” Matthew 6:1-6

‘Faithful over a few things’

The lessons Jesus draws from this parable in verses 10 to 13, and the Pharisees negative reaction, support the idea that this parable is against dishonest management whether in financial matters, or the spiritual guidelines that God has entrusted to us. How we act in the small matters of life now, will determine whether or not God will assign us a position in His eternal kingdom in the life to come. In his spiritual house, Jesus and God are looking for those who love God’s righteousness, encouraging others to confess and forsake sin and receive full forgiveness (be completely debt-free!), while balancing this with mercy towards those who are truly repentant for what they have done – like the prodigal son. 

The words we want to hear from Jesus

“Well done, thou good and faithful servant: thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord.” Matthew 25:21 

Click this link for a poem on this subject, “When Mr. Goodman Went Away”

Watch a video presentation on this parable here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlxM1lfTpNM

3 responses to “The Unjust Steward Parable”

  1. Hello,
    I am 74, a rational man.
    Since I was teen, I knew Jesus from reading the Gospel directly (Arabic, printed about 55 years ago by the Catholic Church). With time, I realized that Jesus only, unlike any other man, gave me the ‘logical’ answers to all my important questions that are related to my own being and the material world’s reality. In other words, Jesus saved me from ignorance; the greatest weakness in human’s life and with which every human baby is born. He helped me have the ‘perfect’ knowledge I was looking for (‘perfect’, relative to my needs). So, I used to be an independent student of Jesus and I never needed, therefore, to look for any man’s honor or privileges.

    By the clear parable of the steward, Jesus reminded me a crucial truth. But this truth is not related to the pre-programmed instructions in our mortal living bodies, known as instincts. So, I hope I will be able to explain this truth to a good extent since English is my third language after French and Arabic.

    [1] The rich man in this parable refers simply to God.
    [2] Its steward is any human, including me.
    [3] In this parable, the stewardship reflects the human’s free-will on earth; one of the greatest God’s gifts.
    [4] The end of this stewardship occurs at the death of one’s body.
    [5] The goods that the steward is responsible of, in this parable, refer to whatever a human has in his life. But, at the death of his human flesh, whatever he still has will be taken away from him for good (the end of his stewardship). In other words, all ‘material’ goods and skills I have now are actually not mine but of God, otherwise I would be able to keep them for eternity.
    [6] The lord’s debtors refer to other humans in one’s life.
    [7] Naturally, Jesus calls all material things that a living human may have ‘the mammon of unrighteousness’ because they are actually God’s goods not his.

    I guess it is clear now why Jesus went on saying:
    “And the lord commended the unjust steward, because he had done wisely”.
    In fact, I used to live as the unjust steward did by helping others, whenever possible, by using God’s goods which I am responsible of during my stewardship on earth.

    And, to make the truth of this parable even clearer, Jesus added:
    “Make to yourselves friends of the mammon of unrighteousness (by using God’s goods before the end of stewardship); that, when you fail (when you die), they may receive you into everlasting habitations (God’s Spiritual Realm of Love, the Everlasting Life) “.

    As far as I know, the rich men in charge of any Christian Church or Denomination around the world have their good reasons not to approve the truth of this crucial parable. I mean; I am afraid that it is rather impossible to publish this truth without facing bad consequences.

    In any case, I wish the best to what the site does.

    Kerim Fahme (born and live in Aleppo city – Syria)

    Like

    1. Dear Kerim,

      We really appreciate your comment on our site. You are obviously a sincere Bible student of many years, and have put a lot of time and careful effort to study the Scriptures and apply them in your life.

      We used to see the unjust steward parable very much the same way you described. However, certain things used to just seem like contradictions, so we puzzled over it for many years. We run a Bible seminar where people from all backgrounds are welcome to come and discuss the Bible together. It is very enjoyable and stimulating. Based on questions that people ask, sometimes we all have to search for deeper answers, and this parable was one of them.

      So for instance, why is the steward described as a ‘unjust’ steward in vs.8 of Luke 16?

      Why does Jesus say to make friends with those who are of the unrighteous mammon in vs 9? And then why does Jesus say after the parable that we CANT serve God and mammon in verse 13?

      In what way can those ‘of the world’ offer true believers ‘EVERLASTING’ habitations? Habitations actually means ‘tents’ – which is a paradox.

      The Pharisees – who were dishonest stewards of God’s truth, making their own laws to countervene God’s, sneered at the parable in verse, so they must have felt somewhat pricked by it.

      The parables of the lost coins, lost sheep and lost sons all run together with this parable, as does the following parable of the rich man and Lazarus. It is as though Jesus was in one place talking to the same audience from start to finish, and that audience was composed of the publicans, sinners, Pharisees, scribes and his disciples, see Luke 15:1-2. Therefore, it is likely that these parables have pertinent lessons for all those in the audience.

      Jesus concludes the parable of the unjust steward with strong lessons against covetousness and dishonest dealings… so this must related to the parable.

      It’s these questions and context that gave us reason to dig deeper. None of this negates your good decisions to use what God has given you for the benefit of others, and there are plenty of other passages encouraging us to be ‘good stewards’ of God. However, in digging deeper we feel that this parable is about stewards in God’s house who are not acting honestly and faithfully with the truth of God’s word and the treasure He has invested in them.

      Thank you for your comments.

      Like

      1. Thank you for your prompt and detailed reply.
        Now, I wonder how you see what I have as material goods in my temporary life on earth.
        Are they mine or of God?
        I am afraid this is the main point of this parable.
        Obviously, if we accept that they are mine (as the law, anywhere on earth, confirms) and not of God fully (given to me just temporarily), all you said about the parable becomes logical.
        I mean by living God’s Unconditional Love towards all others, good and evil, I live the joy for being able to defeat the robotic nature of my living flesh which is supposed to be guided ‘solely’ by its instincts (God’s pre-programmed instructions, embedded in all livings things to serve the material world). I mean, since very long I am no more of this world. Naturally, many people in my environment, including some members of my family, had to hate me for this and even tried to hurt me badly (to prove me I am wrong) for not being interested in following (as they do) our natural instincts of survival, superiority, selfishness and applying justice on others.

        (After my high studies, about 45 years ago, I started a small private business in designing and producing various electronic products for the local consumers. This is how I was able to gain my daily bread and of my assistants and their families… besides some pets… till now.)

        Like

Leave a comment

Trending